Perhaps
nothing can cause such a universal emotional response in drivers as the
dreaded lane-ending-merge like the ones when a lane is closed for road
work or a crash. We all know the drill-- most people move
out of the truncated lane early while a few seemingly impatient people take
advantage of the empty lane to cut in at the front of the
line, causing incalculable road rage amongst those waiting patiently.
Even some of those people cutting in at the
front feel the stress of that tense, last-second merge while
knowing that they're now the target of disdain of dozens of people
behind them. It's even worse for the innocent, well-meaning
motorist who tried to get in earlier but was blocked by self-defeating
road vigilantes.
(Photo
courtesy of Oregon Dept. of Transportation)
In Texas, legally,
there is
no requirement to merge until the taper point. Therefore, this
situation exposes a deep-seated philosophical argument: is it better to
merge early, like most folks do, or wait and merge late at the point
where the lane ends? Fortunately, recent research and
experimentation is helping to inform the debate. Unfortunately,
like so many things in
life, the answer isn't cut-and-dried-- it depends on the situation.
Most
drivers are either taught, or learn on their own (often instinctively),
to merge early. That
just seems to be the "right" thing to do on so many
levels. And sometimes it is indeed the right thing to do. But traffic
experts have discovered in recent years that
sometimes it's actually the wrong thing to do, and the late merge has
now become the recommended procedure in a number of states including
Minnesota, Washington, Missouri, and Kansas, as well as in much of
Europe, where in Germany, it's actually the law. (German zipper-merge sign at
left.)
The "Zipper Merge" The late
merge, known more descriptively as the "Zipper Merge", is
when drivers fill up both lanes and then take
turns merging one-at-a-time
at the
point where one lane ends. That one-at-a-time merge is where
the "zipper" name comes from. Research has shown that this method is
safer and helps to keep things moving more smoothly through the merge
point because drivers are cooperating and creating gaps, thus
eliminating brute force injections into the through lane. It's
those sudden, unexpected forced merges, especially from a standing
stop, that causes shock waves in the traffic flow that creates the
stop-and-go conditions often seen in these situations. When people take
turns and
know that's the expectation, they can gradually open a gap earlier
while still
moving. Drivers in the closed lane can predict where they'll
merge, align themselves, and merge smoothly without having to stop.
These circumstances together result in a smoother and more
consistent traffic flow. And by using the full capacity of
the truncated lane, the length of the backup is reduced correspondingly.
Finally,
one big benefit of the Zipper Merge that is rarely recognized or
discussed but may be the most important
to many folks is this: filling
the lane that is closed prevents opportunistic drivers from taking
advantage
of an empty lane to cut in the front of the line. That
alone makes it worth the price of admission to me. And if both
lanes are used, they will tend to even themselves out, which then makes
it fair for everyone, i.e. the person you let in at the merge point
will have been waiting about as long as you have.
The
biggest obstacle to implementing the Zipper Merge is that pretty much
everyone has to be on the same page in order for it to work. If only
a handful of people do it and the other drivers aren't aware of it,
then it gives the appearance that the zipper-mergers are just taking
advantage,
and many of them may therefore feel like that's what they're doing and
will
abandon it. Furthermore, it's hard to break such a
deeply-ingrained habit and belief system. I myself know the
benefits of the Zipper Merge, but I still feel that visceral need to
merge
early. Therefore, a significant public education campaign
along with signage is needed to make the program work. Studies have
shown that when this is done, the benefits are
realized.
This
humorous description of the Zipper Merge is by a Canadian, but is still applicable to the US:
But there still is a time when
merging early is better
The Zipper Merge works best when traffic is already congested and
moving slowly through a bottleneck. But in those rare instances when traffic is
free-flowing, then the early merge is the best thing to do. Merging
early in this situation is safer and helps to
maintain the free-flow of traffic because, as mentioned before, drivers
who wait until the very last minute often need to slow considerably or
even come to a
stop in order to merge, or will just shove themselves into the through lane. Someone in the through lane then has to slow
considerably or stop to allow them to merge, which then causes the
person behind them to slow or stop, and the dominoes fall from there
and becomes the genesis of a
traffic jam or, worse, a rear-end collision. Merging well in advance in that
situation allows drivers to find
and enter a gap when other drivers only need to make minor
adjustments to their spacing while maintaining speed, thus preserving
the
traffic flow.
So
to summarize (and because many people like things boiled-down to
simple bullet points):
When traffic is already slowing
or congested, use the Zipper Merge.
When traffic is free-flowing,
merge early.
Zipper Merge status in Texas
While
the Zipper Merge is being promoted in other states and is even the law
in places like Germany, it's still virtually unknown in Texas. TxDOT
studied it over a
decade ago, but it has not been officially adopted for widespread
use. A
blog posting by TxDOT's San Antonio office a few years ago is the
first mention of it I've seen in Texas in recent years, and TxDOT's
Waco
district reportedly implemented it at select
work zones in the Temple area for a time. Perhaps as more
states implement it and have good results with it, Texas will join the
party.
Other
sites of interest There are a lot of sites about the Zipper Merge,
but here are a few.
NOTICE
The information provided on this website is provided on an "as-is" basis without
warranties of any kind either express or implied. The author and his agents
make no warranties or representations of any kind concerning any information
contained in this website. This website is provided only as general
information. The author expressly disclaims all liability with respect to
actions taken or not taken based upon the information contained herein or with
respect to any errors or omissions in such information. All opinions expressed
are strictly those of the author. This site is not affiliated in any way with
any official agency.
Cable median barriers
In Texas, legally,
there is
no requirement to merge until the taper point. Therefore, this
situation exposes a deep-seated philosophical argument: is it better to
merge early, like most folks do, or wait and merge late at the point
where the lane ends? Fortunately, recent research and
experimentation is helping to inform the debate. Unfortunately,
like so many things in
life, the answer isn't cut-and-dried-- it depends on the situation.
The late
merge, known more descriptively as the "Zipper Merge", is
when drivers fill up both lanes and then take
turns merging one-at-a-time
at the
point where one lane ends. That one-at-a-time merge is where
the "zipper" name comes from. Research has shown that this method is
safer and helps to keep things moving more smoothly through the merge
point because drivers are cooperating and creating gaps, thus
eliminating brute force injections into the through lane. It's
those sudden, unexpected forced merges, especially from a standing
stop, that causes shock waves in the traffic flow that creates the
stop-and-go conditions often seen in these situations. When people take
turns and
know that's the expectation, they can gradually open a gap earlier
while still
moving. Drivers in the closed lane can predict where they'll
merge, align themselves, and merge smoothly without having to stop.
These circumstances together result in a smoother and more
consistent traffic flow. And by using the full capacity of
the truncated lane, the length of the backup is reduced correspondingly.
