Home | About me | Contact | What's new | Privacy | Search

Texas highways primer
Texas traffic laws

Search this site
This site is not affiliated with any official agency.

Buy Me a Coffee at ko-fi.com

If you found this site informative, please consider making a small donation to help support it. Thanks!


Texas Highways Primer

This page last updated June 23, 2019


Texas is a big place. It's nearly 880 miles from the Louisiana border near Orange to the New Mexico border near El Paso, and nearly 500 miles from the Oklahoma border north of Dallas to the Mexican border in Laredo. That size gives the state a tremendous amount of diversity. A hot, humid sub-tropical climate in the Valley yields to a varying Midwest climate, complete with snow, in Amarillo. There are Piney Woods in East Texas, desert and low mountains in West Texas, and plains, prairies, and the Hill Country in between. The state has some of the nation's biggest metropolitan areas and some of its most desolate ranges. With this size and diversity, a large and rapidly growing population, a booming economy, an increasing role in international trade, and its overwhelming dependence on the automobile, Texas cannot help but have the nation's biggest, most well-developed highway system with nearly 80,000 miles of state-maintained roads.

This primer is designed to give you an overview of the state's highway system and its idiosyncrasies. If you're looking for a route log, check out Texas Highway Routes by David Stanek, a complete listing of all highways in Texas. Both Ron Jackson's TexasFreeway.com  and Andy Field's LoneStarRoads sites have lots of in-depth information on freeways and other highways statewide.

On this page:

Some Texas highway facts

Highways in Texas are managed by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). TxDOT was created in 1991 from the former State Department of Highways and Public Transportation (SDHPT), which itself was created by the merger of the Texas Highway Department and Texas Mass Transportation Commission in 1975. After several earlier failed attempts, the original Texas Highway Department was born in 1917, mainly as a prerequisite in order for the state to receive federal highway funds. Prior to that, counties were responsible for building and maintaining a system of roads that connected county seats.

Here are some basic facts about the state highway system in Texas:

Interstates 3,459
US Highways 11,851
State Highways 16,391
Farm-to-Market roads 40,849
Park roads 349
Frontage Roads 7,546
  • REST AREAS: 90
  • FIRST HIGHWAY: Started in 1918 and finished in 1920, between Falfurrias and Encino in Brooks County, along present day US 281
  • FIRST INTERSTATE: 1956, I‑45 (then US 75) near Corsicana in Navarro County
  • SHORTEST HIGHWAY: Loop 168 in Tenaha, Shelby County, is 391 feet (.074 miles)
  • LONGEST HIGHWAY: US 83 stretches 899 miles from the Oklahoma state line near Perryton to the Mexican border near Brownsville
  • HIGHEST HIGHWAY: A spur from Texas 118 at the McDonald Observatory on Mt. Locke in West Texas is 6,791 feet above sea level
  • BUSIEST HIGHWAY: I-10/Katy Freeway in Houston just east of Beltway 8 carries 366,000 vehicles daily
  • NUMBER OF BRIDGES: 54,180 (more than double the number of any other state); 35,564 of those are on the state system
  • LONGEST BRIDGE: The Fred Hartman Bridge east of Houston is 2.6 miles long

State-maintained highways comprise about 26% of the total roadway mileage in Texas but carry about 73% of all traffic.


In addition to having the nation's largest highway system overall, Texas also has more Interstate mileage than any other state. There are now 19 numbered Interstate Highways in the state:

I-2 I-10 I-14 I-20 I-27 I-30 I-35 I-37I-40 I-44I-45 I-69
I-110 I-169 I-345 I-410 I-610 I-635 I-820

Texas has two of the three "suffixed" Interstates in the nation. The first, I‑35, is split into I‑35E through Dallas and I‑35W through Ft. Worth. I‑69 is split three ways: first, I‑69 splits into I‑69E and I69W at Victoria with I‑69E running south to Brownsville along US 77 and I‑69W continuing south to Laredo along US 59. I‑69C then branches from I‑69W at George West and runs along US 281 south to I‑2 at Pharr.

I-110 I-169 I-345 I-410 I-610

Texas also has two "hidden" or unsigned Interstates: I‑345, which is a short extension of I‑45 in downtown Dallas, and I‑110, which connects I‑10 to the Mexico border in El Paso.

Interstates in Texas were generally built by upgrading existing US or State highways. I‑45 replaced US 75, I‑35 replaced US 81, and I‑40 replaced the famed US 66, to name a few. In urban areas, many existing expressways were simply re-signed as Interstates. The first Interstate contract let in Texas was for a segment of I‑45 in Navarro County near Corsicana in 1956. The latest additions to Texas' Interstate inventory are I‑69, I‑2, and I‑14. (See the I‑69 and I‑14 sections below.) Prior to that, the last Interstate to be completed was I‑27 between Lubbock and Amarillo in 1992.

I‑35 from the DFW Metroplex to San Antonio is the busiest Interstate corridor in Texas with no fewer than 65,000 vehicles per day on its rural sections between Hillsboro and Waco and higher counts as you go further south. As a result, this entire corridor has been upgraded to six lanes over the past two decades. A tollway to bypass Austin (SH 130) from Georgetown to I‑10 at Seguin was completed in 2012. TxDOT is also participating a $1.5 million federal study of I‑35 from Laredo to Duluth, Minnesota, which aims to provide comprehensive improvements to the corridor. (More information on the I‑35 corridor between San Antonio and Austin is available as part of my San Antonio roads pages.)

In addition to I‑35, TxDOT has projects underway or planned to widen the other two legs of the "Texas Triangle" (I‑10 between Houston and San Antonio and I‑45 between Houston and Dallas) to six lanes over the next decade.

Besides increases in passenger vehicles, truck traffic on I‑35 and other Interstates has grown rapidly as a result of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and a resurgence in oil drilling in the state in the past decade. 

Exits/entrances, the ubiquitous frontage roads, and "Texas U-turns"
As you drive through Texas, you may notice that exits and entrances on many of our Interstates tend to be at more frequent intervals than in other states. This is the result of the philosophy of Dewitt Greer, a former long-time director of the state highway department. It was his belief that, given the vastness of the state, Interstates should not just serve "interstate" traffic, but also "interregional" traffic within Texas, and more frequent exits would help facilitate that.

Another byproduct of this doctrine is perhaps the most unique feature of the state's highway system: frontage roads. There are over 7,000 miles of these along freeways in Texas, which is more-- much more-- than any other state. Instead of using new rights-of-way, many Interstates in Texas were built along the routes of existing US highways. Since Interstates have limited access, the state would have had to pay to acquire the access rights of frontage properties when upgrading an existing road to an Interstate. It was decided that it would cheaper to build frontage roads to keep access to those adjacent properties instead of acquiring the rights, not to mention the political expediency of doing to. As a result, this quickly became standard operating procedure at the Highway Department (and subsequently TxDOT) and a large percentage of the state's freeways were built under this policy.

In June 2001, the Texas Transportation Commission considered a major policy change that would have eliminated frontage roads from any new freeways unless absolutely necessary. This rocked many Texans to their core-- enough so that the commission decided to scrap the idea.

There are several ramp configurations used with frontage roads. The "diamond" interchange is typical, with the on- and off-ramps connecting to the frontage roads in the general shape of a diamond relative to the cross street (see illustration below). Sometimes, the ramps are reversed in an "X"-interchange with the exit ramp for the next cross street preceding the entrance ramp from the previous cross street. This is generally the new standard in urban areas as it typically improves safety, reduces exit ramp backups onto the main freeways lanes, provides better access to and from frontage properties, and helps reduce through traffic at the the frontage road intersections, thus improving their operation. Occasionally, if space is limited, both the on and off ramps are built at the same location in a "braided" arrangement where one ramp passes-over the other.

Diamond interchange
Frontage roads with diamond interchanges
  "X" interchange
Frontage roads with "X" interchanges

Speed limits on frontage roads generally range from 50-60 mph in rural areas and 40-50 mph in urban areas. In urban areas, frontage roads are typically one-way in the same direction as the adjacent freeway lanes. In rural areas they are generally two-way. By law, traffic leaving or entering the freeway has the right-of-way over traffic already on the frontage road. 

The ubiquitous frontage roads have another interesting cultural facet-- as you travel through the state, you may notice that people in each of the regions call their frontage roads something different. For example, in Houston and East Texas, they're known as "feeder" roads; in Dallas-Ft. Worth, they're "service" roads; in San Antonio, they're "access" roads; and in El Paso, they're called "gateways". The term generally used in Austin and the state's official term is "frontage" road, which is how you'll see them marked on guide signs statewide, even in the aforementioned areas where the popular vernacular differs. Indeed, what someone calls the roads next to the freeway is a good shibboleth to determine where they're from within the state.

It should be noted that frontage roads (or whatever you call them) are not just found on Interstates-- you'll find frontage roads on freeways regardless of route classification (i.e. Interstate, US, or SH routes).

Native Texans are frequently surprised when they go to other places and find no frontage roads. A comment many make after their trip to another state is, "they don't have frontage roads on their highways!" But many native Texans don't realize how much of an idiosyncrasy our extensive frontage roads are. Conversely, many out-of-state visitors immediately notice and comment on our frontage roads (with no clear majority observed by this author between thumbs-up and thumbs-down.)

Going hand-in-hand with frontage roads are the so-called "Texas U-turns" or "turnarounds". These are separate U-turn lanes that allow traffic heading in one direction on a one-way frontage road to reverse course and head the other way on the opposite frontage road without having to pass through the two frontage road/cross street intersections (see diagram below). This reduces congestion and conflicts in those intersections. Where the cross street passes under the freeway, the turnaround is typically in the same underpass. Where the cross street passes over the freeway, turnarounds can either share the same overpass as the cross street (physically separated from the main road) or have their own separate overpasses. Turnarounds are only used on one-way frontage roads and therefore are generally found only in urban areas. Like frontage roads, these may have different names in different parts of the state although "turnaround" seems to be the predominate term. Most of the state uses the "U-turn ONLY" sign to mark them, although the "turnaround" sign is used in some places. Other terms used for turnarounds are "U-turn lane" and "crossover", although the later more correctly describes an opening in the median on a divided highway.

Turnaround diagram

Turnaround diagram

Typical San Antonio turnaround

Typical turnaround in San Antonio

Exit numbers
Texas, like most states, switched from a sequential exit numbering system to a milepost numbering system in the mid to late '70s and early '80s. The exit number was typically posted on a tab above the exit board, but starting in 2012, signs with the exit number incorporated on the main exit sign began appearing.

Another semantic idiosyncrasy is how TxDOT abbreviates "Interstate". In most other states, it's I‑35, I‑10, etc. Here, TxDOT's official term is "IH", as in IH-35 or IH-10, with "IH" being short for "Interstate Highway". Furthermore, depending which part of the state you're in, you may hear locals using that term as well. (As you can tell by my pages, I prefer "I" myself.) I believe TxDOT uses "IH" because all of their other highway abbreviations are two letters as well, so using IH fit into that standard.

Interstate 69 and Interstate 2
I-69With the growth of NAFTA traffic, Texas began making plans in the late '90s for its segment of Interstate 69 running from Texarkana through Houston and on to Laredo and the lower Rio Grande Valley. 
During the first decade of this century, planning for this route was rolled-into the Trans-Texas Corridor as "TTC-69" (more details on the TTC below), and "Future I‑69" signs began appearing on US 59 in the Houston area in 2000. However, after the demise of the TTC, the I‑69 project was continued as a standalone effort.

I‑69 will upgrade the existing US 59 corridor, one of several corridors being strained by burgeoning NAFTA traffic. South of Victoria, I‑69 forks into two routes: I‑69E along US 77 south to Brownsville and I‑69W, which continues south along US 59 to Laredo. Near George West, another branch, numbered I‑69C, splits off of I‑69W and follows US 281 south to Pharr.  

In August 2011, the Federal Highway Administration approved Texas' request to sign the first section of I‑69 in the state and, four months later, the first I‑69 signs went up on a 6.2 mile section of the US 77 expressway between I‑37 and Robstown just west of Corpus Christi. Those first signs were I‑69, but were later changed to I‑69E. In September 2012, 35 miles of US 59 stretching from Loop 610 in northeast Houston to the Montgomery/Liberty county line was also signed as I‑69. Since then, numerous additional sections have been signed as they have been upgraded to Interstate standards and, as of 2019, there were about 200 miles of I-69 signed in Texas.I-2

As part of the I‑69 project, the federal government also approved signing US 83 through the Rio Grande Valley-- which was already at Interstate standards-- as I‑2, connecting I‑69C at Pharr with I‑69E at Harlingen.

More information on I‑69 in Texas is available at the Alliance for I‑69 Texas website.

Interstate 14
I-14In December 2015, the US Congress passed legislation that approved the designation of another new Interstate in Texas, I‑14. Nicknamed the "Forts-to-Ports" route, this route was proposed by the Gulf Coast Strategic Highway Coalition and is intended to provide a high-speed east-west corridor through the middle of the state connecting Ft. Bliss, Ft. Hood, and Ft. Polk in Louisiana and connectivity via other existing highways to the military ports in Beaumont and Corpus Christi. I‑14 is planned to subsume most of the current route of US 190 from West Texas to the Louisiana border east of Jasper, connecting Brady, Killeen, Belton, Bryan, Huntsville, and Livingston. Some portions of the route have not yet been finalized including the section from Bryan to Huntsville and the routing west of Brady.

While the official designation currently calls for I‑14 to join with I‑10 in West Texas, planners are looking at possibly routing it northwest from Brady through San Angelo to Midland/Odessa. As with I‑69, it is possible that both legs may eventually be built. Also like I‑69, I‑14 will be built piecemeal by upgrading segments of the corridor to Interstate standards as funding becomes available. 

The first signs for I‑14 were installed in April 2017 along the existing US 190 freeway between Copperas Cove and I-35 at Belton.

More information on I‑14 is available at the Gulf Coast Strategic Highway Coalition website.

Interstate 27 extension
I-27TxDOT commissioned a study during the mid '90s to investigate extending I‑27 south from Lubbock. Three corridors were considered: US 87/SH 349 to Midland, a Sweetwater-San Angelo-Junction corridor connecting to I‑10, and another corridor through Big Spring to I‑10 at Ozona. The study concluded that there was not enough traffic at that time, or projected, to warrant an extension of I‑27 for the foreseeable future. Instead, a package of upgrades to US 385, SH 349, US 87, and US 84 was recommended.

Over the years, additional studies have been done on this "Ports-to-Plains" corridor. Those reports have also concluded that , while there is support from many stakeholders for an Interstate, an upgrade to a full Interstate is still not warranted in this corridor. Instead, various options including bypasses, intersection improvements, additional lanes on existing roads, and ITS measures were recommended. You can read more at the Ports-to-Plains coalition website.

During the 2019 legislative session, a bill was passed and later signed into law that directed TxDOT to once again study an extension of I-27 from Lubbock to Laredo.

State highways

State Highway marker The State Highway system includes State Highways (SH), Loops (LP), and Spurs (SP). There are also Park Roads and Business Routes as well as a few "one-off" designations: OSR (Old San Antonio Road) near Bryan, NASA Road 1 leading to the Johnson Space Center, and Beltway 8 around Houston.

A term you are sure to hear across the state is "Loop". Even when they're Interstates, you'll usually hear beltways and other bypasses referred to as "Loop" such-and-such. For example, I‑410 around San Antonio is usually called "Loop 410", and I‑610 in Houston is known simply as "The Loop" (usually with the cardinal location inserted, e.g. "the West Loop.") However, there is an official state highway designation of "Loop (LP)". This category includes many routes that are not even circular! Short state highways whose main purpose is to connect two or more highways are usually designated as a Loop. A good example is Loop 1 (MoPac Expressway) in Austin: it is basically straight and runs pretty much through the heart of the city, but it connects several US, SH, and FM routes along the way.

Business Routes
Prior to 1991, all business routes carried an internal or "hidden" arbitrary State Highway Spur or Loop designation, although in most cases they were actually marked with the business route sign for the parent route from which they branched. In 1991, those internal designations were dropped and the business route designations were made official.

US 90 (A) BusinessHow Texas marks business routes is unique. Firstly, TxDOT often (but not always) puts a small letter at the bottom of the business route shields (see example to the right.) This letter indicates which branch in the series for the parent highway that particular segment is. For example, US 90 passes through several towns. The business route through the first town would be labeled "A", the one through the next town labeled "B", and so on, with the lettering starting at the western or northern end of the route. Letters are often skipped to reserve them for possible future intermediate additions.

Secondly, on US business routes, TxDOT often does not use the "BUS" or "BUSINESS" plaque mounted above the US route marker. Rather, the word "BUSINESS" is typically integrated within the US shield above the number, as shown to the right above.

Business Interstate Loop 35 Interstate Business Loops were fairly rare in Texas until the state decommissioned all US highways that were completely coexistent with Interstates in 1991. Along those Interstates, the US route had previously provided the parent route for the business routes. For example, where I-35 and US 81 coexisted, the business route through towns along the way were designed as Business US 81. Those have since been replaced with Interstate Business Loops.
Park roads
The state also has 88 or so Park Roads and Recreation Roads, which provide access to state and national parks and other designated recreational areas. TxDOT also maintains all roads within state parks, although most are not marked as state routes.
Park Road 43 Recreational Road 255

Farm-to-Market roads

FM 2557More than half of the state's highway system is comprised of the Farm-to-Market (FM) road system, which also includes Ranch-to-Market (RM) roads. Although the first FM road opened in in Rusk County in 1937, the system really grew after the 1949 Legislature set aside $15 million annually (or about $200 million in today's dollars) for their construction to "help get farmers out of the mud." The system is generally considered to be the largest secondary highway system in the world. Its nearly 41,000 miles is more than double the entire state highway mileage of the six New England states combined. All FM roads are paved and most are two lanes.

The semantic idiosyncrasies of Texas roads continues with the FM system. Although the FM/RM route signs read "Farm Road" or "Ranch Road", the routes are officially designated as "Farm-to-Market" or "Ranch-to-Market". More head-scratching comes from the fact that larger green guide signs do mark the routes as "FM" and "RM" (see the "signs" topic below.) There is only one route officially designated as "Ranch Road" (as opposed to "Ranch-To-Market), that being Ranch Road 1 leading up to the LBJ Ranch east of Fredericksburg. There are also three FM Spur routes and three Business FM routes. FM and RM roads are numbered as a single system, i.e. there is not an FM and RM road with the same number.

Old FM sign

Old Farm-to-Market sign ca. 1959
(Source: TxDOT)

Out of the 3,550 routes in the FM system, 3,370 are labeled as FM, leaving just 180 routes designated as RM. The bulk of those are in a large cluster in the Hill Country and Edwards Plateau area west of Austin and northwest of San Antonio. There are also several RM roads in West Texas and the Panhandle, and a few others widely scattered in the rest of the state. The exact FM vs RM naming criteria is a mystery, but a couple of theories have been proffered that include an assumption made by TxDOT on the type of activity one is likely to see along a particular road (e.g. more cattle and horse trailers along RM roads and more farm equipment like combines and tractors plying FM roads), or perhaps just local preference. 

Proposed Urban Route signWith the explosive growth of metropolitan areas in Texas over the years, many FM routes are now wholly or partially in urban areas. One could drive many of these routes and never see a farm or ranch or even any agricultural products being transported to market. Still, only about 4% of the total FM mileage is within urban areas. Because of this incongruity, and to ostensibly allow urban FM roads to take advantage of additional funding sources reserved for metropolitan roadways, an effort was made in 1995 to create a new classification for FM routes in cities called "Urban Roads" to better discern these roadways. The new routes would keep the same route number as the previous FM or RM designation.

New signage was also planned to accompany the change. The proposed sign would have been the simple state highway square with the word "urban" and the route number (see the example above left.) However, an unexpected uproar from the public about changing the apparently beloved Texas-shaped sign-- not to mention the expense of doing so-- eventually stopped the "un-Texan" plan to re-sign the roads. Instead, TxDOT's internal highway designation logs were changed as planned to re-classify those urban segments as UR, but the existing FM and RM signs were left in place.

By 2018, there were 251 roadway segments classified as UR. However, the idea apparently never really accomplished its stated objectives and was never fully implemented. Instead, the inconsistent designations seemed to just cause confusion. So in November of 2018, the Transportation Commission dissolved the Urban Road designation and the routes were returned back to the FM system.

Similar to the Urban Road system, TxDOT created a classification of roadway in 1988 called the Principle Arterial Street System, or PASS (designated as "PA" routes.) This classification allowed urban arterials that weren't state highways, but that provided access to or relief for major state corridors, to receive a special category of state funding. Due to financial constraints, the PASS program was essentially discontinued in 1992 and is slowly being sunsetted with the 190 roadway segments in the PASS system being funded as resources become available or transitioned to other funding categories. One of the shining examples of the PASS system is the Wurzbach Parkway in San Antonio, which incidentally seems to be the only PASS road signed as such.

Rare "PA" route number signage


Texas has always been on the leading edge of highway technology. The Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) at Texas A&M University has spearheaded much of this highway research. Here are some of the many innovations to come from Texas:

  • The "Texas Twist" guardrail end was developed in the 1970s to deflect vehicles by burying the ends of the guardrails. As cars got smaller, though, many overturned when hitting this. So in the late '80s and early '90s, TTI developed a new guardrail end treatment called the ET2000. This new guardrail end absorbs the impact of a vehicle by extruding the rail and breaking the wooden posts (you can see an example of this in the photo above.)
  • Texas initiated the concept of roadside parks. The first such facility opened in 1933 along Texas 71 between Smithville and La Grange. In recent years, though, funding issues, as well as the proliferation of fast-food restaurants, has resulted in Texas closing an increasing number of picnic and rest areas, especially near urban areas.
  • The "adopt-a-highway" project was developed in Texas, and it was the first state to implement it statewide. All but one other states have since emulated this program. There are currently about 3,800 groups collecting litter along 8,000 miles of highway. It is estimated that this program saves the state $3 million a year in litter clean-up costs. (Also see the "Don't Mess With Texas" section below.)
  • Breakaway sign posts and streetlights were developed in a two-year program in the 1970s to reduce the seriousness of roadside object impact accidents. Heavy-duty barrier stops tankerAfter 125 crashes resulted in not one single injury, the federal government mandated their use on all federally-funded roads. Texas also developed the breakaway "coat hanger" rural mailbox support, which was recently redesigned.
  • A modified version of the standard Jersey-barrier designed to reduce the likelihood of smaller vehicles flipping over on impact was developed in the 1980s by TTI. TTI also designed a special heavy-duty, extra-tall guardrail for a downtown San Antonio freeway ramp to prevent heavy trucks from crashing down onto a high school football field below. To test it, they crashed a fully-loaded tanker truck into it! This rail design has since been used in many other locales where extra strength crash-barriers are needed.

Don't Mess With Texas

During the mid '80s, the forerunner of TxDOT introduced what would become an incredibly popular anti-litter campaign: "Don't Mess With Texas". Signs went up around the state and the slogan took off. Today, you can get "Don't Mess With Texas" T-shirts, mugs, stickers, keychains, hats... you get the idea. There have also been numerous "Don't Mess With Texas" commercials featuring various celebrities. TxDOT owns the trademark on the slogan and logo and zealously pursues unauthorized uses.


With freeways in many areas reaching their maximum practical width, the Texas Transportation Commission in 1989 committed to building Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) in the state's largest metro areas. The first system to go online was TransGuide in San Antonio, which at the time was the first advanced metro freeway ITS system in the nation. TransStar in Houston followed shortly thereafter. All of the state's metro areas now have ITS systems, and it has been expanded to several busy rural corridors as well. These systems use a various technologies to monitor traffic conditions and warn drivers of incidents and congestion. ITS also plays a major role in hurricane evacuations and other emergency situations. As of 2017, the state's 14 traffic management centers operated 1,082 dynamic message signs and nearly 2,000 CCTV cameras.


Texas has more road signs than any other state. There are over 500,000 signs on state maintained highways.

Texas is probably the only state that has two different versions of our highway markers. One version is the freestanding sign and the other is for use on freeway guide signs. Here are some examples:

FM 2657 standalone marker   FM 2657 guide sign
SH 151 standalone marker   SH 151 guide sign
Old SH 2Old SH 2 After World War II, the route marker for state highways was changed to today's boring black and white square. Prior to then, the shield featured the much more unique circle and five-point star designs shown at the left. Based on photos, the one on the far left seems to be the original route shield used in the 1920s. Sometime in the 1930s, it appears to have been changed to the one on the right.

Toll roads

SH 130 tollUntil the early 2000s, Texas law prevented the state from building or operating toll highways. Instead, they could be built and operated by subsidiaries of TxDOT or independent agencies created specifically for that purpose. For instance, the Texas Turnpike Authority built and operated tollways in the Dallas area, including the Dallas-Ft. Worth Turnpike, which was the state's first toll road. North Texas tollways are now operated by North Texas Tollway Authority while the Harris County Toll Authority built and operates several tollways in the Houston area (see sidebar below).

In the late '90s, a private toll road, the Camino Columbia, was built to connect the Columbia Solidarity Bridge northwest of Laredo to I‑35. Due to a lack of traffic caused by federal delays to implementing the trucking rules of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), that road eventually was sold to the state and is now operated by TxDOT.

In the early 2000s, with worsening urban congestion and declining revenue from the static state gas tax, the state promoted toll roads as a major mechanism to fund new or expanded roads. To facilitate this in areas without existing toll authorities, the legislature authorized the creation of so-called Regional Mobility Authorities (RMAs). Perhaps the most controversial toll road proposal was the statewide Trans-Texas Corridor project (see below).

Toll roads in Texas are marked with special signage such as that shown to the right above.

The Sam Houston Tollway around Houston is also referred to as Beltway 8. However, only the frontage roads along most of the route are actually Beltway 8, which is a state highway. The tolled mainlanes are just the "Sam Houston Tollway", which is operated by the Harris County Toll Road Authority.
While it is officially titled "Beltway 8" and signed as such, it is actually listed in the state's highway designation files as State Loop 8. The "Beltway" designation was assigned as it had been named the "Outer Belt" by Houston officials since its inception. 

Trans-Texas Corridor

Trans-Texas Corridor logo (TM)In 2002, Texas Governor Rick Perry announced a concept for a massive new transportation system in Texas. The plan, called the "Trans-Texas Corridor" (TTC), was subsequently approved by the legislature and called for 4,000 miles of superhighway/rail/utility corridors crisscrossing the state. As envisioned, each corridor would have been 1,200 feet wide and included separate roadways for passenger vehicles and trucks, separate tracks for freight and passenger rail, and a right-of-way for utilities such as gas, oil, and water pipelines and electrical transmission and telecommunications lines. Specifically, here's how a typical corridor would have been divvied up:

  • Four truck lanes, two each way (A on the diagram below)
  • Six passenger vehicle lanes, three each way (B)
  • Two sets of tracks for high-speed passenger rail, with stations (C)
  • Two sets of tracks for freight rail (D)
  • Two sets of tracks for commuter rail, with stations (E)
  • A utility corridor about 200 feet wide (F)
  • Maintenance, safety, and expansion zones as necessary

Trans-Texas Corridor

Trans-Texas Corridor typical cross-section
(Letters correspond to descriptions above)

The roadways would have had limited interchanges with exits only at intersections with other TTC routes, Interstates, US highways, and major state highways. It was planned that the passenger roadways would have speed limits of 80 mph. The corridors would have been developed and operated by private companies under a state franchise. These companies would charge tolls and fees for users. 

There were four priority corridors:

  • TTC-35, to parallel or overlap I‑35 from Denison to Laredo
  • TTC-69/future I‑69, from Texarkana to Laredo via Houston, with branches to the Lower Rio Grande Valley
  • I‑45 from Dallas to Houston
  • I‑10 from El Paso to Orange

The project, however, met with fierce opposition across the state. Opposition was especially pronounced in rural areas as the wide corridors would have taken many acres of farming and ranch lands. Furthermore, there was a general discontent with the concept of having the roads operated by private companies, especially ones with foreign ties. As a result, the project was killed by the Legislature in 2009. The TTC-35 and TTC-69 projects, which were in advanced planning at the time, continued but not under the TTC brand. The TTC-35 project was also eventually canceled. However, the segment from Georgetown to Seguin, which had originally been conceived as a traditional toll project, was allowed to be completed as a regional project and today is SH 130. Planning for TTC-69 (the I‑69 extension) continued as a traditional Interstate project (see I‑69 above.)

TTC map

Map of proposed Trans-Texas Corridor
(Priority routes are in gold)

Speed limits

Texas is the only state that does not have statutory speed limits for different types of highways in the state system. Instead, a general limit of 70 mph applies on any rural numbered highway regardless of classification or number of lanes and 60 mph on any other rural roadway. A 30 mph general limit applies in urban areas. These limits can be raised or lowered on specific segments based on an engineering study. Speed limits can be raised to 75 mph on numbered highways and up to 85 mph on select roadways. This means Texas is the only state that has 75 mph speed limits on two-lane roads. 

85 mph speed limit signAs speed limits have been increased across most of the US in recent years, Texas has lead the way. Today, Texas has an 80 mph speed limit on about 520 miles of I‑10 and I‑20 in west Texas. Several tollways in the Austin area also have an 80 mph speed limit, and SH 130 from SH 45 south of Austin to I‑10 near Seguin has an 85 mph speed limit-- the highest in the United States.

Prior to 2011, Texas posted separate speed limits for trucks and for nighttime. The truck limits were usually 60 mph when the general speed limit was 65 mph or higher and 70 mph when the general speed limit was 75 mph or higher. Nighttime speed limits were 65 mph when the daytime limit was 70 mph or higher with nighttime limits for trucks generally 55 mph. All truck and nighttime speed limits were repealed in 2011.

To help reduce air pollution, Texas experimented with so-called "environmental speed limits" in the Houston and Dallas-Ft. Worth areas starting in 2000. This scheme lowered the speed limit by 5 mph on roads with an existing 65 or 70 mph limit. In 2002, speed limits in the Houston area were arbitrarily lowered to 55 mph regionwide, but widespread opposition, poor compliance, and a finding that the lowered limit did not significantly improve air quality scuttled that plan within a couple of years and speed limits returned to the original 5 mph reduction scheme. However, the uproar caused the state legislature in 2003 to ban any new environmental speed limits. Environmental speed limits in the DFW region were completely repealed in 2015.

In late 2014, TxDOT conducted a pilot project for variable speed limits at three locations around the state. Variable speed limits are those that can be adjusted in real-time to address congestion, inclement weather, construction, or other issues that could affect traffic safety. The results of the pilot project showed that the concept was beneficial. To date, though, no permanent implementations have been planned.

Tunnels & ferries

TxDOT operates two ferry services. The longest is on SH 87 from northern Galveston to Port Bolivar. Another short ferry connects Port Aransas and Aransas Pass on SH 361. Harris County also operates the Lynchburg Ferry east of Houston near San Jacinto State Park. The Harris County Toll Road Authority studied a possible bridge to replace the Galveston-Bolivar ferry, but determined it to not be feasible.

There are currently no tunnels on the state highway system. At one time, TxDOT did operate a tunnel under the Houston Ship Channel on SH 146 between La Porte and Baytown. It was replaced in the early '90s by the impressive cable-stayed Hartman Bridge. There are, however, three road tunnels in Texas that are not part of the state highway system: the Washburn Tunnel, which is also under the Houston Ship Channel on Federal Road; the Addison Airport Toll Tunnel in Addison north of Dallas (operated by NTTA); and one in Big Bend National Park.

Other sites of interest

Texas Department of Transportation
Don't Mess With Texas campaign
Texas Highway Routes (by David Stanek)
TexasFreeway.com (by Ron Jackson)
LoneStarRoads.com (by Andy Field)
Port-to-Plains Coalition
Alliance for I‑69 Texas
San Antonio Freeway System
Houston Freeways
Dallas-Ft. Worth Freeways

This page and all its contents are Copyright 2023 by Brian Purcell

The information provided on this website is provided on an "as-is" basis without warranties of any kind either express or implied.  The author and his agents make no warranties or representations of any kind concerning any information contained in this website.  This website is provided only as general information.  The author expressly disclaims all liability with respect to actions taken or not taken based upon the information contained herein or with respect to any errors or omissions in such information.  All opinions expressed are strictly those of the author.  This site is not affiliated in any way with any official agency.